Legal Opinion

In re Kraemer

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.

The trustee, with authority of the creditors, interposed objections to the bankrupt’s discharge on the ground that he had obtained credit upon materially false statements in writing, made by him respecting his financial condition. One of these statements was made on April 2,1924, to Deere & Webber Company, and the other to the De Laval Separator Company October 30, 1924. It is conceded that these statements were false, and were known to the bankrupt to be so. There is evidence. to the effect — and it is obvious — that credit was extended to the bankrupt in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Friend v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gilpin v. Merchants' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  3. In re WeitzmanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1923
  4. In re HarrDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1906
  5. In re LeveyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wickman MacHine Tools, Inc. v. Bradford (In Re Bradford)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
  2. In re SheridanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  3. In re ProutDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API