Legal Opinion

Zirnhelt v. Carter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 2014No. A13-1053PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal from judgment on a negligence claim that originated in conciliation court, appellant argues that the district court erred by (1) concluding that the case was not time-barred; (2) awarding damages in excess of the conciliation court’s jurisdictional amount; and (3) failing to perform a complete comparative-fault analysis. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent George Thomas Zirnhelt’s son, Joseph Zirnhelt, was traveling south on Highway 13 in his father’s car on October 12, 2006. Zirnhelt’s son attempted to make a left-hand turn on a green arrow across the northbound lanes of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Rhee v. Golden Home Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Roehrdanz v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dave Knutson Siding LLC v. Dustin Fetter, Lisa ThostensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
  2. Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. LeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API