Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hall

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1953No. Appeals, 84-87PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The present appellants, with George W. Mayo, were charged with conspiring with each other “to erect, set up, open, make or draw a lottery”. They along with Mayo were convicted by a jury and were sentenced. In each of these appeals it is contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. The charge of conspiracy relates to a numbers lottery within the provision of §601 of The Penal Code of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, 18 PS §4601.

A confederation and agreement to effect an unlawful object seldom can be established by direct testimony as to its precise terms.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Holly v. AsheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Commonwealth v. RosenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. JermynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Commonwealth v. GiovengoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. FrancisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. SteinbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. CasertaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API