Commonwealth v. Vallone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
We allowed an appeal by the Commonwealth in this case because there is involved the proper interpretation and application of a rule of evidence which is of extreme importance, especially in its effect upon methods of criminal investigation by law enforcement officers.
Defendant was indicted under the Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, section 517, for knowingly transporting a female for the purpose of prostitution. At the trial the court admitted testimony given by a member of the Pennsylvania Motor Police to the effect that defendant, after his arrest, was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. KarmendiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. ZoramboSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- People v. MedinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. CocciolettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DraveczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.