Legal Opinion
In Re Special Proceedings
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 21, 2004No. 03-2052, 04-1383PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Chief Judge.
This appeal is an outgrowth of two federal corruption cases involving city officials in Providence, Rhode Island. One set of indictments — the Glancy case— named tax officials Joseph Pannone, David Ead, and Rosemary Glancy. See In re Special Proceedings, 291 F.Supp.2d 44, 47 (D.R.I.2003). The second indictment — the Corrente case — also named Pannone in addition to Frank Corrente, who was Providence Mayor Vincent A. Cianci, Jr.’s administrative director; a superseding indictment handed down in the Corrente case on April 2, 2001, added the mayor and three other defendants.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena, MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. TeemerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MoloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jeffrey SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.