Patterson Steel Co. v. Bailey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceSwindall, J.
I concur in the conclusion. I cannot agree that the Workman’s Compensation Law should be construed as the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kornegay intimates this court should construe it. Such an interpretation would conflict with many prior decisions of this court, some of which I shall hereafter discuss. Under such a holding none of the findings or judgments of the Commission would ever become final and conclusive.
In the main the opinion is too much like a Mother Hubbard dress.
This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission dated June 2, 1930, in favor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marland Production Co. v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Olentine v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Allen v. Elk City Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Ward v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.