Legal Opinion
Ebert v. Clarke
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 14, 2004No. 8:04CV40PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the petitioner’s pro se statement of appeal (filing 15) from an order that was entered by Magistrate Judge Gossett on April 7, 2004 (filing 12), permitting the respondent to file a limited response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Upon careful review of the court file, and after considering the arguments made and authorities cited in petitioner’s brief (filing 16), 1 I conclude that the order should be-sustained because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Jesus Robeldo Aguilar v. Warden, Yankton Federal Prison CampDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
- Pieper v. JeffreysDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Ronald E. Rousseau v. Judge Kimberly Craven, in her official capacity as CRST Attorney General; and Brenda Claymore, Chief Judge of the CRST, in official capacityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2026
- Rountree v. RewertsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.