Legal Opinion
Martin v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 14, 1982No. 59074PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
CLINTON, Judge.
Our prior opinion is withdrawn.
In light of the unorthodox way our earlier opinion was produced, the State, in effect, is urging that the Court En Banc engage in its essential function of reviewing an initial opinion on original submission to a panel of the Court.1 Through examination of portions of the record now pointed to by the State and upon further reflection we believed there is enough substance to certain grounds for rehearing formulated by the State,2 and granted leave to file to determine anew whether more than the requirements of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Boles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Goffney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.