Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1988No. 499-83PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CLINTON, Judge.

Before us on appellants’ petition for discretionary review are convictions for burglary, affirmed by the San Antonio Court of Appeals in a published opinion.1

We granted appellants’ petition for discretionary review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in finding appellants knowingly and intelligently waived their right to counsel while asserting their right to represent themselves.2

The State argues Maddox v. State, 613 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) controls because the representation was of a hybrid nature and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Goffney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Ganther v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API