Johnson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Before us on appellants’ petition for discretionary review are convictions for burglary, affirmed by the San Antonio Court of Appeals in a published opinion.1
We granted appellants’ petition for discretionary review to determine whether the court of appeals erred in finding appellants knowingly and intelligently waived their right to counsel while asserting their right to represent themselves.2
The State argues Maddox v. State, 613 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) controls because the representation was of a hybrid nature and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Maddox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by185 opinions
- Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Goffney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ganther v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.