Legal Opinion

Morss v. Franklin Coal Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1903No. 361PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Motion to limit issues.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The respondent, in its answer, denies that it is insolvent, or has committed the act of bankruptcy charged; and further alleges that the petitioners are not entitled to *999maintain these proceedings, not being in fact creditors. Upon all of these three issues it demands a jury trial. But as to whether the petitioners are creditors, it is clear that it is not entitled' to any, unless the court sees fit to allow it. By section i8d of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 551 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3429]):

“If the bankrupt or aDy of his creditors shall *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Simonson v. SinsheimerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  3. In re ChristensenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mechanics' Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. C. A. Hoover Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. In re NeasmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
  3. Granite City Bank v. TvedtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API