Legal Opinion

Persinger v. Holst

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2002No. Docket 224635PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

Plaintiff, Richard D. Persinger, conservator of the estate of Helen Fuite, appeals as of right from the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant in this legal malpractice action. We affirm.

In January 1996, defendant, Richard C. Holst, an attorney, was contacted by Mark Hall (Hall) regarding estate planning services on behalf of Helen Fuite, a widow in her eighties. Hall and his brother, Tim Hall, had previously been Holst’s clients. Subsequently, Holst drafted and Fuite executed a will, a durable general power of attorney, and at least two deeds. The will named Hall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fast Air, Inc v. KnightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Coleman v. GurwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Samuel D Begola Services, Inc. v. Wild Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. MinchMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In Re Cummin EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Farrow Group Inc v. Detroit Land Bank AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. In Re Conservatorship of GmMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API