Legal Opinion

Smith v. Treasure Valley Seed Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 2019No. Docket No. 45543PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevan, Justice

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Vernon K. Smith appeals from the district court's award of sanctions. In a prior appeal in this case, we held that attorney fees could not be awarded against Smith under section 12-121 because Smith was counsel on the case, rather than a party to the case. We remanded this dispute for further proceedings to determine whether attorney fees should be awarded against Mr. Smith personally. On remand, the district court considered all options available to it and awarded attorney fees as a sanction under Idaho Rule of Civil Procedure 11, stating that the original case never…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Entek GRB, LLC v. Stull Ranches, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. State v. Faron Raymond HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Rockefeller v. GrabowIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Flying "A" Ranch, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Idaho State Bar v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Smith v. HipplerIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Alpha Mortgage Fund v. DrinkardIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In the Matter of the Estate of Victoria H. Smith, --------------------------------------------------- VERNON K. SMITH, JR., individually, and in his capacity as the former attorney-in-fact, agent and/or fiduciary for Victoria H. Smith and/or the Estate of Victoria H. Smith, and in any other capacity relevant to these proceedings; DOES 1-20 v. FORD ELSAESSER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Victoria H. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API