Legal Opinion
Rockefeller v. Grabow
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 2003No. 29031PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal after the case was remanded for the district court to determine whether a real estate developer-broker who breached his fiduciary duties to his principal should forfeit all or a portion of the development fee that the developer-broker earned before the breach. The district court awarded the developer-broker 87.5% of his development fee and attorney fees, and the landowners appealed. We affirm the award of the development fee and the award of attorney fees.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In January 1992, the appellants John and Laura Grabow and the respondent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Rockefeller v. GrabowIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- Gustaves v. GustavesIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Kuhn v. COLDWELL BANKER LANDMARK, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Dea Haight v. Idaho Dept of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- Flying "A" Ranch, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Advanced Medical Diagnostics, LLC v. Imaging Center of Idaho, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.