Legal Opinion

Vadnais v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 4, 1976No. 45675PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action to recover on a fire insurance policy. Defendant insurer refused to pay, claiming the fire was caused by an intentional act of plaintiff. The matter was tried in Washington County District Court. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant insurer. The court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Defendant petitioned this court for discretionary review, which was granted. We reverse-

At the time of trial, Warren Vadnais, his wife and youngest son lived in a rural area in Forest Lake, Minnesota. Vadnais…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Buck v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Hull v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Grorud v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quast v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Ogema v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Heine v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Westbrook State Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API