Legal Opinion
Quast v. Prudential Property & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1978No. 47238PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment for respondent, Prudential Property and Casualty Company, entered in a civil action brought by appellant, Oscar R. Quast, to recover upon a property insurance contract for damages caused by a fire in his home. The judgment is based on a special jury verdict that the fire was of an incendiary nature and that appellant participated in, arranged for, or had direct knowledge of its setting. We affirm.
In November 1972, appellant bought a home for $18,000 in which he planned to reside until he could remodel it for sale at a profit. On December 11,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Elgi Holding, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gregory's Continental Coiffures & Boutique, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Nathan v. St. Paul Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Caserta v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Godwin v. Farmers Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Neises v. Soloman State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. DaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.