Legal Opinion

Pima County v. Anklam

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1936No. Civil No. 3704PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This is an action by Pima county, brought at the instance of the county attorney, to recover from Dr. George W. Purcell, who was the county physician of said county during 1933 and 1934, the sum of $3,910, alleged to have been paid to him by the defendants, the board of supervisors, without authority of law. And judgment is aiso asked against the members of the board of supervisors for said sum, together with 20 per cent, penalty, and against the sureties on their official bonds.

Defendant Purcell was appointed by the board of supervisors as county physician of said county on January 3, 1933,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Austin v. BarrettArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Avery v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1900
  3. County of Santa Cruz v. BarnesArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Batterton v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Salt Lake County v. ClintonUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Community Council v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pima County v. SchaussCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API