In re D.K.D.

¶1 D.K.D., a seriously developmentally disabled individual, was committed by the District Court to the Montana Development Center (MDC) for a period of one year. He does not appeal from the order of commitment, but does appeal from the portion of the commitment order that authorized MDC staff and treating professionals to administer medication to him on an involuntary basis, pursuant to *77MDC policy. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

ISSUES

¶2 A restatement of the dispositive issue on appeal is whether the District Court committed error, much less plain error, when in its order of…