Legal Opinion
Golden Buddha, Inc. v. New York Times Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMilleb, J.
The plaintiffs bring this action against the New York Times Company because of the publication by it at the *580request of the other defendants of the following advertisement: “ Special Announcement — Ruby Foo’s wishes to inform its patrons and the public that it has never been connected in any way with Ruby Foo’s Town and Country Beach Club at Atlantic Beach, L. I. Our only restaurants in Greater New York: The Den, 240 W. 52nd St., CO 5-0705. East Side, 161 E. 54th St., PL 5-2437. Our 2 restaurants are world famous for serving the finest in Chinese foods. Refined atmosphere.”
The plaintiffs claim…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Gale v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Kuhn v. VelozAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goldstein v. GarlickNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Golden Buddha Inc. v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Denis v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Hirschfield v. York Board of Realtors, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1972