Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Veloz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

Where a plaintiff in an action for libel must rely on extrinsic facts in order to establish the libel, special damage must be pleaded. (O’Connell v. Press Publishing Co., 214 N. Y. 352.)

In the present complaint plaintiff sets forth extrinsic facts, but fails to allege special damage. Accordingly her complaint must be held insufficient, unless the article complained of is libelous per se.

The publication which is alleged to have been procured by defendants consists of a newspaper story in the nature of a “ write-up ” concerning the origin of gowns worn by defendant Yolanda Veloz, a theatrical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. KittermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Dale System, Inc. v. General Teleradio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Remington v. BentleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
  4. Cal-Therm Industries, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Golden Buddha, Inc. v. New York Times Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API