Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Garlick

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1971PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeo Brown, J.

Fundamental questions concerning the liability of a newspaper which publishes an advertisement that allegedly injures the advertiser’s competitors are presented on these four separate motions by the newspaper defendants for summary judgment.

This is an action by J. S. Garlick Parkside Memorial Chapels, Inc. (hereinafter Garlick Parkside) which is in the business of conducting funerals, and by Larry Goldstein, oae of its shareholders, for a permanent injunction and compensatory and punitive damages against a competing funeral home, Joseph N. Garlick Funeral Homes, Inc. (hereinafter Garlick),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Green v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bay City-Abrahams Bros., Inc. v. Estee Lauder, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. Suarez v. UnderwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eimann v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API