Legal Opinion

Oberg v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1955No. Civ. 20622PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVallee, J.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in an ' action for the value of labor and material alleged to be extras furnished under a construction contract.

On September 29, 1950, plaintiffs entered into a contract with the city of Los Angeles for the construction of a subway and appurtenant work on Sepulveda Boulevard. During the course of construction a dispute arose as to whether plaintiffs were required by the contract to install membrane waterproofing over all concrete joints in contact with fill other than expansion joints. The city asserted plaintiffs were required to do so by virtue of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Roy v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. El Escorial Owners' Ass'n v. DLC Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. De SalvoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Sawyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Pacific Architects Collaborative v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Hawley v. Orange County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API