Legal Opinion

Brown v. Dicus

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1909No. 21,240PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Crawford Circuit Court; William C. Viz, Judge. Application by John Dicus for license to retail-intoxicating liquors, against which Martin J. Brown and others remonstrate. From a judgment for the applicant, remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Appellee applied to the board of commissioners of Crawford county, at its June session, 1907, for a *52license to sell intoxicating liquors in the town of English, in said county, as provided by §8318 et seq. Burns 1908, §5314 et seq. R. S. 1881. Appellants appeared before the board and remonstrated against the granting of a license to appellee. They moved to strike out and dismiss the application, for the reason, as alleged, that it did not sufficiently describe the room in which the applicant proposed to sell intoxicating liquors. This motion the board overruled. There was a hearing before the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dunn v. State ex rel. EakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Manlove v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Stauffer v. Salimonie Mining & Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State ex rel. Cashman v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Molihan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Farmers State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Hood v. McCarthyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State ex rel. McClannahan v. NoftzgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Barton v. FullerIndiana Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API