Legal Opinion

Hood v. McCarthy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1910No. 21,645PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Cass Circuit Court; John S. Lairy, Judge. Application by Daniel F. McCarthy, against which Deo S. Hood and others remonstrate. From a judgment for the applicant, remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The Board of Commissioners of the County of Miami, on September 3, 1907, overruled appellants’ remonstrance, and granted appellee a license to retail intoxicating liquors for one year. An appeal was taken to the Miami Circuit Court, and, on application, the venue was changed to the Cass Circuit Court, in which a demurrer was sustained to appellants’ amended remonstrance. Appellants declined to amend, and on December 19, 1907, final judgment was rendered in favor of appellee. It is alleged on appeal that the court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer to appellants’ remonstrance.

It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. DicusIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hale v. BergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Meyer v. Farmers State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Leavell v. DoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Ballew v. ArnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Gary Amusement Co. v. HirsthIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API