Legal Opinion

Brinker v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1956No. 1777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant, a taxicab driver, was convicted of violating Section 52(a)' of the Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations for the District of Columbia. Section 52(a) provides in part-:

“ * * * the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way, slowing down or stopping if need be to so yield, to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a crosswalk * *

The alleged violation took place at night at Adams Mill Road and Lamont Street, N.W. Appellant was proceeding in a southerly direction on Adams Mill Road and collided with a pedestrian, who was removed to a hospital before the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. CalderonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Forte v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  5. Daeche v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. McGilton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Sanderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Blackmone v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API