Legal Opinion

McGilton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1958No. 2147PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

McGilton and Gardener, on a joint information, were charged and convicted of petit larceny of property of Woodward & Lothrop, a corporation. McGilton alone has appealed.

At trial neither defendant presented any evidence on his behalf, so the convictions rest entirely on the testimony of the two Government witnesses. One of these, a detective, testified that at about 2:20 p. m. on the day in question, he and a fellow officer were in an automobile and observed the defendants standing on the corner of 10th and Eye Streets, N. W., which is approximately one and a half blocks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Brinker v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Sanderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Blackmone v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API