Legal Opinion
Gal-Or v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2011No. 09-869CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a pro se action brought by Benjamin Gal-Or, a retired professor and scientist. He claims that defendant has utilized his inventions without paying him compensation, thereby infringing on his patent and committing a taking under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We dis*478missed plaintiffs initial complaint on June 25, 2010, and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint setting out his claims with more precision. He did so on August 2, 2010. Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ethicon, Inc. And Inbae Yoon, M.D. v. United States Surgical Corporation and Young Jae ChoiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Schering Corporation v. Roussel-Uclaf Sa, Involuntary v. Zeneca Inc. And Zeneca Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Benjamin Gal-Or v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Gal-Or v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015