Legal Opinion

Pillsbury v. Kesslen Shoe Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 1, 1939PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

September 9, 1935, this plaintiff commenced an action against this defendant to recover for personal injuries received in a collision between the defendant’s truck and the plaintiff’s automobile. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiff for $6,750 and judgment was entered for such amount together with costs and interest. February 18, 1937, this action was commenced to recover for damages to the plaintiff’s automobile resulting from the same collision. The defendant pleaded the former judgment in bar of the action. The plea was sustained and the action dismissed. The plaintiff excepted.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Doran v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. King v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Sprague v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Beegan v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Kradoska v. KippSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Department of Human Services v. LowatchieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  4. Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Bray v. SpencerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API