Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Adams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1926No. 19936. Department TwoPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Sprague, seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries, which she claims she suffered as the result of the negligent operation of one of the defendants’ taxicabs at a street intersection in Seattle on September 22, 1924; claiming that the defendants’ taxicab was negligently driven against her Ford sedan automobile which she was driving, causing injuries to her person, for which she seeks recovery.

The defendants, by their answer, denied the allegations of the complaint as to negligence and as to plaintiff’s injury; pleaded, as a first affirmative defense, contributory…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Noonan v. PardeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Fields v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Martin v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Doran v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Reilly v. . Sicilian Asphalt Paving Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Dearden v. HeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Hayes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API