Legal Opinion
Kradoska v. Kipp
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 29, 1979PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DELAHANTY, Justice.
Yta C. Kradoska, the plaintiff, appeals from an order entered by the Superior Court, Waldo County, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The question presented on this appeal is whether the doctrine of res judicata bars the plaintiff’s action. The appeal is sustained in part and denied in part, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings.
Kradoska is the daughter of Stuart M. Farrington and Harriet H. Morrow. Far-rington divorced Morrow sometime after Kradoska was bom but before he met his death in 1959. At the time of his death, he was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- La Societe Anonyme Des Parfums Le Galion v. Jean Patou, Inc. And Michael Stramiello, Jr., Collector of Customs of the Portof New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Stark v. StarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SlaghtSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Donald Roy, of Waterville, Kennebec County, State of Maine v. The City of Augusta, MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- William A. Burns v. Jamie N. Watler, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Beegan v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Currier v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Henriksen v. CameronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.