Legal Opinion

Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. Hughes

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1940No. 30768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

We copy the following from appellants’ brief as the accepted statement of the issues determined, as claimed by them, viz.:

“This is an appeal from an order of confirmation in the sale of land under an attachment proceeding and the judgment rendered therein. * * *
“(b) The Issues Actually Tried in the Court Below
“That the price bid for this land,’ being $1,644.85, for 320 acres of highly improved land in Cuming county, was so inadequate to its value that in conscience and fair dealing the sale should not be confirmed.
“Also that the (district) court could not hear this matter at the time it did,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Douglass v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. McKeighan v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dunn v. BozarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lindberg v. TolleNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Doon v. AdcockNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. MurrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Stitzel v. Hitchcock CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Nile Valley Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchankNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Federal Land Bank v. DymekNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Simmons v. MurrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API