People ex rel. Roeser v. Gartland
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Grant, J.) Information in the nature of a quo warranto to test the title of school-district officers. Respondents bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
An information in the nature of quo warranto was filed against the respondents, requiring them to show by what authority school district No. 3, of Ingallston, in the county of Menominee, exercises the franchises of a school district, and the respondents held, used, and exercised the offices of the district respectively.
The school district in question is bounded on one side by Green bay, and by reason of the meandering nature of the shores of the same the sectional territory hound by it is largely fractional. The residents of the district are for the most part fishermen. They all reside on the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gildemeister v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- State ex rel Douglas v. School District No. 108Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- State ex rel. Murdock v. RyanUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- People ex rel. Blomquist v. NappaMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.