Legal Opinion

Romo v. Department of Motor Vehicles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1991No. H006698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

Ronald Raul Romo (appellant) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County denying his petition for a writ of mandate seeking to prevent the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV or respondent) from suspending his California driver’s license based on three convictions for drunk driving within seven years. (Veh. Code, §§ 13352, subd. (a)(5), 23170.) The petition challenged the suspension on the ground that the first conviction, rendered in the State of Virginia in 1982, was unconstitutional. The trial court found appellant had failed to prove…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Pollack v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Thomas v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morris v. HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Morris v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Gaston v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API