Legal Opinion

Boullier v. SAMSAN COMPANY

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 25, 1966No. Eq. No. 3281PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

This is an employee’s original petition for .benefits under the workmen’s compensation act. After a hearing before the trial commissioner a decree was entered denying and dismissing the petition. The cause is before us on the petitioner’s appeal from the decree of the full commission which affirmed the decree of the trial commissioner.

The record discloses that petitioner was employed as a “painter,” so called, at respondent’s jewelry factory; that in the performance of her duties she used lacquers and thi-nners, substances which admittedly emit noxious fumes; that in the area where she worked…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marchiatello v. Lynch Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Ryerson v. A. E. Bounty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Lima v. William H. Haskell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
  4. Clarke v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Beauchesne v. David London & Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Pechan v. Dynapro, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Montanaro v. Guild Metal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. Mulcahey v. New England Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API