Legal Opinion

Beauchesne v. David London & Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 18, 1977No. 77-113 AppealPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

This employer’s appeal from a decree of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding benefits to an employee for injuries received at a company-sponsored Christmas party raises an issue of first impression in this jurisdiction. Hereafter we shall refer to the employer as “the company” and the employee by his last name.

The 'company, whose specialty is the sale of burlap bags and reconditioned barrels, is a family corporation whose ownership and management team consists of a father and his three sons. Beauchesne began working for the company in February of 1974 as a part-time employee and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. PROVIDENCE TEACHERS U., LOC. 958, AFT v. McGovernSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  3. Moore's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Kohlmayer v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. Therkildsen v. Fisher BeverageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Rhode Island Commission for Human RightsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. New England Development, LLC v. BergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  5. Emmett v. Town of CoventrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API