Legal Opinion

Ryerson v. A. E. Bounty Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 28, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

There are no requests for change in the finding, and it appears that the plaintiff was sev enty-two years of age and was employed at an average weekly wage of $21 as a watchman at the company’s stables in Stamford, and was subject to call of his employer at all times during the twenty-four-hour period. He lived above the stables and it was a part of his duties to mix feed for the horses. In doing so it was the custom to “fix” the feed with saltpeter and nitre before giving it to them, and this was done in one of the rooms in which the plaintiff lived.

At six o’clock on the evening of October…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Gonier v. Chase Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Boyle v. Columbian Fire Proofing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  5. Brightman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Hoard v. Sears Roebuck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Savage v. St. Aeden's ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Herbst v. Hat Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API