Legal Opinion

Schenectady Trust Co. v. Emmons

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

We sustain the appellant’s challenge to the power of the Appellate Division to amend a final judgment by granting to counsel an extra allowance and certain disbursements payable out of a trust fund.

The action is in equity for an accounting by a trustee. Prior to the trial Nathaniel D. Emmons, a grandson of the settlor but not a beneficiary of the trust — to whom reference will be made as the grandson — was permitted to intervene and, when made a party defendant, raised the issue of the validity of the trust. The judgment entered at Special Term, which sustained the trust, was in character…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Schenectady Trust Co. v. EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Schenectady Trust Company v. EmmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Schenectady Trust Co. v. EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Matter of Friend v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hansen v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Seamerlin Operating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. People ex rel. Sedotto v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Realty Equities Corp. v. GerosaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Breeding v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API