Schenectady Trust Co. v. Emmons
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
We sustain the appellant’s challenge to the power of the Appellate Division to amend a final judgment by granting to counsel an extra allowance and certain disbursements payable out of a trust fund.
The action is in equity for an accounting by a trustee. Prior to the trial Nathaniel D. Emmons, a grandson of the settlor but not a beneficiary of the trust — to whom reference will be made as the grandson — was permitted to intervene and, when made a party defendant, raised the issue of the validity of the trust. The judgment entered at Special Term, which sustained the trust, was in character…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Schenectady Trust Co. v. EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Schenectady Trust Company v. EmmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Schenectady Trust Co. v. EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Matter of Friend v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hansen v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Seamerlin Operating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People ex rel. Sedotto v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Realty Equities Corp. v. GerosaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Breeding v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.