Legal Opinion

Breeding v. Weaver

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

An administrative proceeding was initiated by the respondent for the fixation of the maximum rent applicable to the unit occupied by the petitioner tenant. Concededly, authority existed here for fixation as of the date of first renting, April 1, 1952 (State Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 36, subd. [c]).* * But the rent was fixed by the local rent-administrator as of the date when the order was issued, Janu*419ary 20, 1955. The tenant did not protest the order in any respect, hut the landlord protested the maximum rent fixed. And, on the landlord’s protest, the tenant insisted upon the propriety…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Griffin v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Schenectady Trust Co. v. EmmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. La Fontaine Properties, Inc. v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Neri v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hurwitz v. CapetaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bernard v. JoyNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Manno v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API