Collins v. School District No. 39
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court of Chisholm, in which plaintiff secured judgment by default. Prom the judgment, defendant appealed to the district court for St. Louis county where judgment was ordered for plaintiff by default. Prom an order, Dibell, J., denying defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment in favor of plaintiff for $204.56, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
In this ease judgment upon default was obtained by plaintiff against the defendant in the municipal court of Chisholm. The defendant appealed from such judgment, and in the district court of St. Louis county judgment was again entered against defendant upon its default. The defendant then moved to vacate the judgment, which *308motion, was denied. The defendant appealed from both the judgment and order denying the motion to vacate.
The only question raised or discussed upon the appeals taken is the sufficiency of the complaint to sustain the judgment. The complaint sets out the indebtedness sued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peach v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Kingsley v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Solomon v. VinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Slater v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alden v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913