Vitarelle v. Vitarelle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties of all other claims arising out of the same transaction or out of the same or related facts, even if based upon a different theory involving materially different elements of proof. The rule applies not only to claims litigated but also to claims that could have been raised in the prior litigation” (Matter of City of New York v Schmitt, 50 AD3d 1032, 1033 [2008] [citations omitted]; see Osborne v Rossrock Fund II, L.P., 82 AD3d 727, 727-728 [2011]; Shelley v Silvestre, 66 AD3d 992,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silverman v. Leucadia, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Prudential Lines, Inc. v. Firemen's InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- City of New York v. SchmittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Shelley v. SilvestreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Osborne v. Rossrock Fund II, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.