Legal Opinion
Osborne v. Rossrock Fund II, L.P.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
“Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties or those in privity with them of a cause of action arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as a cause of action that either
*728was raised or could have been raised in the prior proceeding” (Goldstein v Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co., 32 AD3d 821, 821 [2006]; see Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). Here, the claims of the plaintiff George R Osborne (hereinafter the appellant) arise out of the same transaction as those raised in a prior foreclosure action, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Goldstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Rossrock Fund II, L.P. v. OsborneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cypress Hills Cemetery v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by4 opinions
- Uffer v. Travelers Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Archibald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Mazzurco v. Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Vitarelle v. VitarelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011