Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Rossrock Fund II, L.P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

“Under the doctrine of res judicata, a disposition on the merits bars litigation between the same parties or those in privity with them of a cause of action arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions as a cause of action that either

*728was raised or could have been raised in the prior proceeding” (Goldstein v Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co., 32 AD3d 821, 821 [2006]; see Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). Here, the claims of the plaintiff George R Osborne (hereinafter the appellant) arise out of the same transaction as those raised in a prior foreclosure action, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Goldstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Rossrock Fund II, L.P. v. OsborneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Cypress Hills Cemetery v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Uffer v. Travelers Companies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Archibald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Mazzurco v. Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. Vitarelle v. VitarelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API