Legal Opinion

Waldron v. Armstrong Rubber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1975No. Docket 17327, 17328PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

Previously, 1 we held that plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of warranty sounded in tort under Michigan law and that, by application of our "borrowing” statute, 2 the 2-year Indiana statute of limitations pertaining to tort claims barred the plaintiffs’ suit. However, our Supreme Court vacated our order 3 and remanded the case back to us for reconsideration and determination of whether Indiana would apply the 4- year limitation period established by UCC § 2-725 4 or the 2-year limitation period applicable to actions for injuries to persons or property. 5 Therefore, we will now attempt to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. State Mutual Cyclone Insurance v. O & a Electric CooperativeMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Horvath v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Helvey v. Wabash County REMCIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Withers v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Owens Corning v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. John Johnson v. Ventra Group, Inc. And Ventratech LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Simmons v. Clemco IndustriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Johnson v. Hockessin Tractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1980
  5. McKinney v. Fairchild International, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API