Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Fairchild International, Inc.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1997No. 23467PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARCHER, Justice:

The legal question presented in this appeal concerns whether the Kentucky or the West Virginia savings statute applies when a second action is filed in a West Virginia circuit court after the original action, which was timely filed in a federal court located in West Virginia, was dismissed. The Circuit Court of Raleigh County, by summary judgment, dismissed the complaint of Charles and Sandra K. McKinney against Fairchild International, Inc. (“Fairchild”) based on its findings that the complaint was filed in the circuit court beyond Kentucky’s one-year statute of limitation…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Painter v. PeavyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Morgan v. Biro Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Samuel Ballengee v. CBS Broadcasting, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. MacE v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Mills v. Quality Supplier Trucking, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kornfeind, W. v. New Werner Holding Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. California State Teachers' Retirement v. Don L. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2018

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API