Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. A. Amorello & Sons, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
The Occupational Health and Safety Administration charged A. Amorello & Sons, Inc. with violating an OSHA regulation, which states:
No employer shall permit earthmoving ... equipment which has an obstructed view to the rear to be used in reverse gear unless the equipment has in operation a reverse signal alarm distinguishable from the surrounding noise level or an employee signals that it is safe to do so.
29 C.F.R. § 1926.602(a)(9)(ii). The administrative body that adjudicates these disputes (called the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, or “OSHRC”) found…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Comite Pro Rescate De La Salud, Etc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Ephraim Isaac v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- In Re Stephen C. PerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Brock v. L.R. Willson & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.