Legal Opinion

Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. A. Amorello & Sons, Inc., and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 8, 1985No. 84-1568PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Circuit Judge.

The Occupational Health and Safety Administration charged A. Amorello & Sons, Inc. with violating an OSHA regulation, which states:

No employer shall permit earthmoving ... equipment which has an obstructed view to the rear to be used in reverse gear unless the equipment has in operation a reverse signal alarm distinguishable from the surrounding noise level or an employee signals that it is safe to do so.

29 C.F.R. § 1926.602(a)(9)(ii). The administrative body that adjudicates these disputes (called the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, or “OSHRC”) found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Comite Pro Rescate De La Salud, Etc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Ephraim Isaac v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Stephen C. PerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Brock v. L.R. Willson & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API