Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Erickson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 4, 2003No. A03A1259PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this Dram Shop Act case before this Court. David Hodges filed the action against Paul and Brenda Erickson (“the Ericksons”) to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision with Brian Hammock shortly after Brian left a party at the Ericksons’ home. In Erickson v. Hodges (“Erickson F), we vacated the trial court’s order denying the Ericksons’ motion for summary judgment and remanded for the court to consider the deposition of Brian’s brother, Scott Hammock. Upon remand, the trial court granted summary judgment to the Ericksons. Hodges…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Riley v. H & H OPERATIONSSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Griffin Motel Co. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Erickson v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Pirkle v. HawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shin v. ESTATE OF CAMACHOCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Willbanks v. SUGARLOAF CAFE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Willbanks v. SUGARLOAF CAFE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API