Willbanks v. SUGARLOAF CAFE, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentMlKELL, Judge
The motion for reconsideration filed by Sugarloaf Café, Inc. d/b/a Buffalo’s Café (“Buffalo’s”) compels me to revisit the facts of this case. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that a jury issue remains on whether Buffalo’s knew that, when Phillips left the bar, she would soon drive a motor vehicle.
OCGA § 51-1-40 (b) provides that
a person . . . who knowingly sells, furnishes, or serves alcoholic beverages to a person who is in a state of noticeable intoxication, knowing that such person will soon be driving a motor vehicle, may become liable for injury or damage caused…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Riley v. H & H OPERATIONSSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Haley v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Page v. Atlanta Center Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Griffin Motel Co. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.