Legal Opinion · Dissent

Willbanks v. SUGARLOAF CAFE, INC.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 2004No. A03A2180Published

1DissentMlKELL, Judge

The motion for reconsideration filed by Sugarloaf Café, Inc. d/b/a Buffalo’s Café (“Buffalo’s”) compels me to revisit the facts of this case. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that a jury issue remains on whether Buffalo’s knew that, when Phillips left the bar, she would soon drive a motor vehicle.

OCGA § 51-1-40 (b) provides that

a person . . . who knowingly sells, furnishes, or serves alcoholic beverages to a person who is in a state of noticeable intoxication, knowing that such person will soon be driving a motor vehicle, may become liable for injury or damage caused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cohen v. HartlageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Riley v. H & H OPERATIONSSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Haley v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Page v. Atlanta Center Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Griffin Motel Co. v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API