Feely v. Birenbaum
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Plaintiffs-respondents brought suit to enjoin and restrain defendants-appellants, two unrelated males, from residing together or with persons unrelated by blood, marriage or adoption at defendants’ single family residence. The trial court found that the subdivision trust indenture applicable to defendants’ residence prevented defendants from living together in their single family residence. The primary issue on appeal is whether the subdivision trust indenture proscribing the use of houses within the subdivision by more than one family interdicted defendants’ use of their house…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laclede Gas Company v. Hampton Speedway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Davis v. LongMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cleaver v. Central States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Greenberg v. KoslowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pierce v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martin v. Rent Control Board of CambridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Blackburn v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Ladue v. HornMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Collins v. GoetschHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
- London v. HANDICAPPED FACILITIES BD., ETC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.