Legal Opinion

Bos v. Holleman De Weerd Auto Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1929No. Docket No. 12, Calendar No. 34,056PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant sold plaintiff an automobile on time without delivering to him a certificate of title thereto. Plaintiff used the car approximately three months, and, not being able to secure a certificate of title, returned the car to defendant and sued to recover what he had paid. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. The sale was void. Act No. 46, Pub. Acts 1921, as amended by Act No. 16, Pub. Acts 1923. Plaintiff was entitled to a judgment for the amount of money he had paid, plus the interest, it having been paid without consideration.Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Taylor v. BurdickMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Jensen v. WrothNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kruse v. CareyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API