Legal Opinion
Primcot Fabrics, Department of Prismatic Fabrics, Inc. v. Kleinfab Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1974No. 73 Civ. 4589PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GURFEIN, District Judge:
This is an action for an injunction to restrain the defendant from printing and selling copies of á printed textile fabric in several colors known as “pattern No. 850” or “Romeo”, which is the subject of a design copyright, Certificate of Registration No. H 51204 owned by the plaintiff. P.Ex. I. 1 The claim for relief is based on 17 U.S.C. § 112, and jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). This a motion for a preliminary injunction. An evidentiary hearing was held. Both plaintiff and defendant are textile converters who print patterns on the greige goods.
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu Ltd. (Inc.) and David FaberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boisson v. Banian, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Peel & Company Inc v. Rug MarketCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Financial Information, Inc. v. Moody's Investors Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Prince Group, Inc. v. MTS PRODUCTSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.