Legal Opinion

Washingtonian Publishing Co. v. Pearson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1939No. 222PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

By this suit, instituted in the District of Columbia, March 8,- 1933, petitioner seeks an injunction, damages, etc., because of alleged unauthorized use of a magazine article copyrighted under Act March 4, 1909 (Ch. 320, 35 Stat. 1075; U. S. C., Title 17). Pertinent portions of the statute are in the margin.1 Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus, *32210 U. S. 339, 346; Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 215 U. S. 182, 188.

The trial court sustained petitioner’s claim and directed ascertainment of profits, damages, etc. The Court of Appeals ruled that, as copies of the magazine had not been promptly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Lumiere v. Pathé Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Joe Mittenthal, Inc. v. Irving Berlin, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Stone v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. DunnahooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API