Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Brady

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1958No. A-6896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole point presented by the City in its application for writ of error is predicated on the asserted proposition that Art. 1269m, Vernon’s Texas Civ. Stat., is unconstiutional in that it is a local or special law on account of the limiting provision of Section 27(a) of that statute. The City contends that the Act is applicable, therefore, only to cities which had a population of 10,000 or more according to the 1940 Federal census; and thus, any cities which increased their population over 10,000 subsequent to that date could not qualify.

The City frankly admits that all attacks on Art.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trimmier v. CarltonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Glass v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Popham v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Highway Department v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Helmsley v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. Bush v. Lone Star Steel CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Sherwood Lanes, Inc. v. City of San AngeloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Hamilton v. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Overton v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API